Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Discussion #7
For Robert D. King's article titled "Should English Be The Law?", King's purpose was to inform people about America's history and ask the simple question of: Should English be the law? His attitude throughout the article was very informative and professional. He never seemed as if he was being condescending or negative about any of his thoughts. Robert King is a professor of Asian studies at University of Texas in Austin. He has written many journals already about language uses and he is very trilingual himself. He is reaching out to an audience of the general public. There was no certain people that he was writing for except maybe people who read Atlantic Monthly, where it was first published. The purpose of the audience is to question themselves if English should be the law in America. The attitude of the audience is open-minded, yet skiddish of what this article may entail. The audience, like myself, is probably worried about what the author's tone will be like throughout this piece. The audience could be very closed minded Americans who only think everyone in America should speak English. The text was a very long article, probably typed up online using Microsoft Word and you can read the article by opening up a magazine. I read the article at night in my bedroom with a very quiet and calm community.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with you when you say Robert D. King does not speak condescendingly towards his audience. I think if he did, the message of his main idea of language unifying nations would not get across. I think you could also mention a few examples he lists from other nations comparing the "unique otherness," he states about nations being themselves. I like how he has a professor at not one but multiple universities. I feel this way he can elaborate in more than one location to furthermore reach out to his audience about his idea.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYour post is very interesting. You did an outstanding job explaining fully, in dept, what the author was trying to do to reach out to his audience.
ReplyDelete